Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Notation guide.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Exploring education through artificial intelligence proposed methodology.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Visualizations comparing gender and Internet types.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Correlation matrix.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Architecture of the proposed stacked ensemble learning model, illustrating the use of three base learners (decision tree, random forest, and XGBoost) to generate predictions (Prediction 1, Prediction 2, and Prediction 3), which are then combined by a gradient boosting meta-learner to produce the final prediction.

This approach leverages the strengths of individual models to enhance overall predictive accuracy.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

CNN model evaluation.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

RCNN model evaluation.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Decision tree evaluation.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Stacking approach evaluation.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

XG boosting evaluation.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

Random forest evaluation.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Table 2.

Accuracy of ML classifiers.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 11.

Confusion matrix evaluation of CNN.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Fig 12.

Confusion matrix evaluation of RCNN.

More »

Fig 12 Expand

Fig 13.

Confusion matrix evaluation of XGB.

More »

Fig 13 Expand

Fig 14.

Confusion matrix evaluation of decision trees.

More »

Fig 14 Expand

Fig 15.

Confusion matrix evaluation of stacking approach.

More »

Fig 15 Expand

Fig 16.

ROC curve CNN.

More »

Fig 16 Expand

Fig 17.

ROC curve RCNN.

More »

Fig 17 Expand

Fig 18.

ROC curve stacking meta model gradient boosting.

More »

Fig 18 Expand

Fig 19.

ROC curve XG boosting.

More »

Fig 19 Expand

Fig 20.

ROC curve decision trees.

More »

Fig 20 Expand

Fig 21.

ROC curve random forest.

More »

Fig 21 Expand

Fig 22.

Accuracy chart of ML and DL classifiers.

More »

Fig 22 Expand