Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Taxonomy of approaches to addressing imbalanced data issue.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Concepts of oversampling and undersampling techniques.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

An example of using DBSCAN to categorize data points of a dataset for fixed radius (ε) and the minimum number of samples = 5.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

The stages of RN-SMOTE.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

The methodology for dividing the samples of datasets for evaluation in classification methods: (a) splitting the datasets into training and test sets for datasets with sufficient samples; (b) using k-fold cross-validation for evaluating datasets with fewer samples.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Table 1.

The used datasets with their details.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

The definition of a confusion matrix.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Imbalanced classification metric.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

The average values of evaluation metrics on ILDP, QSAR, Blood and Health risk imbalanced datasets using SVM classifiers and 10-fold cross validation methodology.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

The average values of evaluation metrics on ILDP, QSAR, Blood and Health risk imbalanced datasets using ADA classifiers and 10-fold cross validation methodology.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

The average values of evaluation metrics on ILDP, QSAR, Blood and Health risk imbalanced datasets using RF classifiers and 10-fold cross validation methodology.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Fig 6.

Comparison of CRN_SMOTE results with RN_SMOTE in ILPD dataset for KSMOTE = 5.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Comparison of CRN_SMOTE results with RN_SMOTE on QSAR dataset for KSMOTE = 5.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Comparison of CRN_SMOTE results with RN_SMOTE on Blood dataset for KSMOTE = 5.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Comparison of CRN_SMOTE results with RN_SMOTE on Health risk dataset for KSMOTE = 5.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Table 7.

A comparison of the RN-SMOTE, SMOTE-Tomek Link, SMOTE-ENN, and the proposed 1CRN-SMOTE methods on the ILPD and QSAR datasets is presented, based on various classification metrics using the Random Forest classifier.

More »

Table 7 Expand

Table 8.

A comparison of the RN-SMOTE, SMOTE-Tomek Link, SMOTE-ENN, and the proposed 1CRN-SMOTE methods on the Blood and Health-risk datasets is presented, based on various classification metrics using the Random Forest classifier.

More »

Table 8 Expand

Fig 10.

Clusters generated using DBSCAN: (a) Clusters consisting of samples from category 1; (b) Clusters consisting of samples from category 2.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Table 9.

A comparison of the CRN-SMOTE and RN-SMOTE methods on the health risk dataset based on different classification metrics using the Random Forest classifier.

More »

Table 9 Expand