Table 1.
Comparison of advantages and disadvantages of wildlife monitoring methods.
Fig 1.
(a and b) High resolution image of Procapra przewalskii.
Fig 2.
Overall framework of this study.
Fig 3.
Network structure of the YOLOv7 model.
Fig 4.
GSConv module.
Fig 5.
CARAFE structure.
Fig 6.
The execution process of CMC module.
Table 2.
Experimental environment.
Table 3.
Model training parameter configuration.
Table 4.
Comparison with different detection methods.
Fig 7.
(a)YOLOv7; (b) Ours.
Fig 8.
(a) YOLOv7 model; (b) Ours.
Fig 9.
The standard deviation of the training results for each round of our improved YOLOv7 model.
Fig 10.
Comparison of some test results.
(a) Original YOLOv7. (b) Improved YOLOv7.
Table 5.
Comparison of tracking results between our method and other mainstream methods.
Table 6.
Ablation study of different improved methods.
Fig 11.
Comparison of tracking results.
(a) Original image; (b) Deep SORT model; (c) Our method.