Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Experimental protocol for the fatiguing task.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Comparisons of anthropometry, somatic maturation, and training experience between children and adolescents.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Mixed two-way repeated measures analysis of variance for maximal power output (Pmax, (A)), theoretical maximal force (F0, (B)), and theoretical maximal velocity (v0, (C)) between children (blue solid line) and adolescents (red dotted line). Post hoc results for the main block effect are represented for children and adolescents between each block. The significance for each group concerning the final decrement is represented (B1 vs B7).

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 2.

Descriptive data and mixed two-way repeated measures analysis of variance for F-v parameters between children and adolescents.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Mixed two-way repeated measures analysis of variance for Fatigue Index (A), rating of perceived exertion (RPE, (B)), and mean heart rate (HRmean, (C)) between children (blue solid line) and adolescents (red dotted line). Post hoc results for the main block effect are represented for children and adolescents between each block. The significance for each group concerning the final decrement is represented (B1 vs B7).

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 3.

Descriptive data and mixed two-way repeated measures analysis of variance for mechanical effectiveness parameters, sprint time performance, RPE and FI between children and adolescents.

More »

Table 3 Expand