Table 1.
Concrete mix proportion.
Fig 1.
Prefabricated fractured granite-concrete model.
Fig 2.
PFC simulation mesoscopic parameters.
Table 2.
Parameters PFC simulation microscopic.
Fig 3.
Comparison between the experimental results and the numerical simulation results.
(a) concrete (b) granite (c) composite (d) 90ocrack.
Fig 4.
Stress-strain curve of uniaxial compression test of granite-concrete composite.
(a) S = 200 mm2 (b) S = 300 mm2 (c) S = 600 mm2 (d) S = 900 mm2.
Fig 5.
Elastic modulus of precast crack inclination rock-concrete composite with different relative areas.
(a) Elastic modulus -relative area relationship (b) Three-dimensional function surfaces.
Fig 6.
Failure modes of the precast crack inclination rock-concrete composite with different relative areas.
Fig 7.
Principle of energy calculation.
Fig 8.
Energy evolution of granite-concrete composite with precast crack Angle under different relative areas.
Fig 9.
Relative area to total energy at peak point of precast fissure inclined rock-concrete composites.
Fig 10.
Conversion rate of elastic energy of precast fissure inclined rock-concrete composite by relative area.
Fig 11.
Elastic energy conversion surface of precast crack angle rock-concrete composite with different relative areas.
Fig 12.
Elastic energy consumption rate-stress-strain curve of precast crack inclination rock-concrete ccomposite with different relative areas.