Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Crime recidivism prediction: Rank of different models.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Prevalence and model evaluation: TPR, TNR, PPV, NPV.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Prevalence and model evaluation: F-scores, Falkes-Mallows and Jaccard.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Prevalence and model evaluation: Accuracy, MCC, Gmean, AUC, BA, BI, Kappa.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Model comparison: TPR, TNR, PPV, NPV, F-scores, Falkes-Mallows and Jaccard.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Model comparison: Accuracy, MCC, Gmean, AUC, BA, BI, Kappa.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Model rankings: TPR, TNR, PPV, NPV, F-scores, Falkes-Mallows and Jaccard.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Model rankings: Accuracy, MCC, Gmean, AUC, BA, BI, Kappa.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Table 2.

Variance of rankings of models by different metrics.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 8.

Model evaluation with different thresholds: TPR, TNR, PPV, NPV, accuracy, MCC, BA, BI, F1 score.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Model evaluation with different thresholds: AUC, Falkes-Mallows, Jaccard, Gmean, Kappa, F-beta scores, markedness and DOR.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

Variance of evaluation metrics by number of thresholds.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Fig 11.

OLS results of number of thresholds on variance of evaluation metrics with 95 percent confidence intervals.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Table 3.

Crime recidivism model evaluation metric values.

More »

Table 3 Expand