Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Descriptive statistics of the participants.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Descriptive statistics of social safeness and pleasure and recovery scale.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

t-Test results conducted to determine whether participants’ social safeness and pleasure scale and resilience scale total and sub-dimension scores differ according to gender variable.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Results of One-Way Analysis of Variance (One-Way ANOVA) conducted to determine whether participants’ social safeness and pleasure scale and resilience scale total and sub-dimension scores differ according to age variable.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Results of One-Way Analysis of Variance (One-Way ANOVA) conducted to determine whether participants’ social safeness and pleasure scale and total and sub-dimension scores of the resilience scale differ according to faculty variable.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Results of One-Way Analysis of Variance (One-Way Anova) conducted to determine whether participants’ social safeness and pleasure scale and total and sub-dimension scores of the resilience scale differ according to the department variable.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

T-Test results conducted to determine whether the total and sub-dimension scores of the participants in the feeling of social safeness and pleasure scale and the resilience scale differ according to the variable of doing sports.

More »

Table 7 Expand

Table 8.

Table of results of pearson product moment correlation analysis conducted to determine the relationship between the scores obtained from the social safeness and pleasure scale and the scores of the resilience scale.

More »

Table 8 Expand