Table 1.
Characteristics of study participants.
Table 2.
Summary of participants’ responses to our closed questions.
Table 3.
Goal relevance.
Table 4.
Side effects.
Table 5.
Role of employees.
Table 6.
Data process.
Table 7.
Vagueness.
Fig 1.
Subgroup analysis ‐ mean proportion of first order codes (related to ethical issues) contained in the five overarching categories (goal relevance; adverse side effects; role of employees; data process; vagueness) for each four sub-groups of participants: Women (n = 5), men (n = 19), participants with (n = 7) and without (n = 17) a conflict of interest.
Nb codes = total number of codes produced by all participants in the subgroup.