Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Randomization reporting and risk of bias for included randomized trials.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Forest plot of mean differences for baseline age for included trials.

The NINDS rt-PA Stroke Study (NINDS) is the only included study for which the 95% confidence interval did not include the null.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Forest plot of mean differences for baseline weight for included trials.

The NINDS rt-PA Stroke Study was the only included study for which the 95% confidence interval did not include the null.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Forest plot of mean difference for baseline NIHSS for included trials.

The ECASS-3 RCT was the only included study for which the 95% confidence interval did not include the null.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Pooled absolute risk difference for all included trials.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

The pooled effect of treatment with and without the NINDS rt-PA Stroke Study and ECASS-3 RCT.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Table 2.

Recommendations for improved randomization reporting in randomized controlled trials. Adapted from Berger and Cristophi [32].

More »

Table 2 Expand