Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

AES-128 structure.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Profiling side-channel attack.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Inception block parameter change process.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Process of feature fusion.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

A single Inception module structures the feature extraction process.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

InceptionNet model.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Table 1.

Hyperparameter selection.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 7.

The basic architecture of an autoencoder.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Long short-term memory network structure diagram.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

LU-Net model.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

Comparison of attack results on the ASCAD dataset.

A: Training Accuracy B: Attack Performance.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Table 2.

Comparison of training parameters of ASCAD dataset.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 11.

Comparison of attack results on the DPA contest v4 dataset.

A: Training Accuracy B: Attack Performance.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Table 3.

Comparison of training parameters of DPA contest v4 dataset.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 12.

Comparison of attack results on the AES_RD dataset.

A: Training Accuracy B: Attack Performance.

More »

Fig 12 Expand

Table 4.

Comparison of training parameters of AES_RD dataset.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 13.

Using LU-Net model to remove gaussian noise.

More »

Fig 13 Expand

Fig 14.

Side channel attack results.

A: Denoised with DAE B: Denoised with LU-Net.

More »

Fig 14 Expand

Fig 15.

Using LU-Net model to remove permutation noise.

More »

Fig 15 Expand

Fig 16.

Side channel attack results.

A: Denoised with DAE B: Denoised with LU-Net.

More »

Fig 16 Expand

Table 5.

Comparison of denoising performance between LU-Net and DAE models.

More »

Table 5 Expand