Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Design flow chart.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Topology of the Coupling Paths. (a) traditional ML-CPW. (b) SVA-ML-CPW.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Simplified equivalent circuit diagram of SVA-ML-CPW. (a) Odd mode. (b) Even mode.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Simplified equivalent circuit diagram of SVA-ML-CPW. (a) Odd mode. (b) Even mode.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Simplified Equivalent Circuit Diagram of ML-CPW Signal Path.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Simulation model of SVA-ML-CPW. (a)Top view. (b)Bottom view.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Effect of control parameters on passband mode. (a)Number of via hole elements. (b)Total length of coupled microstrip line LMall.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Effect of control parameters on passband mode. (a) Microstrip coupling distance m. (b) Width of the second CPW section W1.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Impact of slotline width variation G2 on the first notch band.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

Filter passband and transmission zero points.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Fig 11.

Topology of the dual narrowband notch paperclip structure.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Fig 12.

Dual narrowband notch paperclip structure: Branch B and Branch C.

More »

Fig 12 Expand

Fig 13.

Effect of branch width and self-couple distance on notch center frequencies f B and f C.

More »

Fig 13 Expand

Fig 14.

Impact of branch width and self-couple distance on the notch band.

More »

Fig 14 Expand

Fig 15.

Electric field distribution and the effect of total branch length on notch center frequencies f B and f C.

More »

Fig 15 Expand

Fig 16.

Second-Order Harmonics f B and f C of f B and f C.

More »

Fig 16 Expand

Fig 17.

The appearance and disappearance of f B.

More »

Fig 17 Expand

Fig 18.

The open-loop resonator.

More »

Fig 18 Expand

Fig 19.

Impact of coupling distances S1 and S2 on the notch center frequency and suppression depth of the open-loop resonator.

More »

Fig 19 Expand

Fig 20.

Effect of varying coupling distances S1 and S2 on the wide stopband phenomenon.

More »

Fig 20 Expand

Fig 21.

The inverted S-shaped EBG.

More »

Fig 21 Expand

Fig 22.

Effect of three control parameters of the inverted S-shaped EBG. (a) LS2. (b) WS1. (c) LS1.

More »

Fig 22 Expand

Fig 23.

Series complementary resonant rings. (a) Mounting Effect. (b) Embedded Position.

More »

Fig 23 Expand

Fig 24.

Current Distribution of the Prototype Filter at 2.4 GHz.

More »

Fig 24 Expand

Fig 25.

Electric Field Spectrum of the Proposed Filter at the Center Frequencies of the Six Passbands, a) 3.08 GHz, (b) 4.65 GHz, (c) 5.98 GHz, (d) 8.77 GHz, (e) 11.88 GHz, (f) 13.74 GHz.

More »

Fig 25 Expand

Fig 26.

Electric Field Spectrum of the Proposed Filter at the Center Frequencies of the Five Notch Bands, (a) 3.96 GHz, (b) 5.45 GHz, (c) 6.86 GHz, (d) 11.28 GHz, (e) 12.68 GHz.

More »

Fig 26 Expand

Fig 27.

Group delay.

More »

Fig 27 Expand

Fig 28.

Series complementary resonant rings. (a) Mounting Effect. (b) Embedded Position.

More »

Fig 28 Expand

Table 1.

Comparison of the parameters of this filter and reference filter.

More »

Table 1 Expand