Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Four-fold table of disproportionality methods.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Formulas and threshold values of ROR and PRR.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 1.

The flowchart of identifying cilostazol related adverse events in FAERS database.

Note: DEMO, demographic and administrative information; DRUG, drug information; REAC, adverse event coding; ROR, reporting odds ratio.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Proportion of adverse drug outcomes.

Note: DE, death; DS, disability; HO, hospitalization; LT, life-threatening; OT, other; RI, required intervention to prevent permanent impairment.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 3.

Clinical characteristics of reports with cilostazol.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 3.

TOP 8 Reporter country.

Note: JP, Japan; US, The United States; KR, Korea; DE, Germany; ES, Spain; PH, Philippines; UK, The United Kingdom; CN, China.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Distribution of adverse events due to cilostazol reported annually.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 4.

The positive signal strength and the frequency of reports in the top 30 PT of cilostazol.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Signal strength of reports of cilostazol at the SOC level in FAERS database.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Fig 5.

Positive risk signals for cardiovascular adverse events with cilostazol.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

PT distribution of cardiovascular adverse events with cilostazol.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Table 6.

Time-to-onset analysis for signals with cilostazol.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Time-to-onset of cilostazol related adverse events.

More »

Fig 7 Expand