Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Comparison of the previous and proposed methods.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Insulator with contamination and LC.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 2.

Pollution severity readings.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 2.

Leakage current data condition on normal distribution.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 3.

Definition of indices behavior.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 3.

Border area scaling of C2-C6 in normal distribution.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Proposed Methodology Flowchart.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Summary schematic of condition rule.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Failure estimation of Wt indicator

(a) Wt = 0 (b) Wt = 3 (c) Wt = 6 (d) Wt = 9.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Failure estimation of SDD indicator

(a) SDD = 0.05 (b) SDD = 0.12 (c) SDD = 0.2.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Failure estimation of NSDD indicator

(a) NSDD = 0.15 (b) NSDD = 0.25 (c) NSDD = 0.35.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

MDM comparison for Wt mode in (a) time domain condition (b) frequency domain condition (c) overall condition.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

MDM comparison for

(a) Wt = 0 (b) Wt = 3 (c) Wt = 6 (d) Wt = 9.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Fig 11.

MDM comparison for SDD mode in (a) time domain condition (b) frequency domain condition (c) overall condition.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Fig 12.

MDM comparison for

(a) SDD = 0.05 (b) SDD = 0.12 (c) SDD = 0.2.

More »

Fig 12 Expand

Fig 13.

MDM comparison for NSDD mode in (a) time domain condition (b) frequency domain condition (c) overall condition.

More »

Fig 13 Expand

Fig 14.

MDM comparison for (a) NSDD = 0.15 (b) NSDD = 0.25 (c) NSDD = 0.35.

More »

Fig 14 Expand

Table 4.

Failure probability and CFP of all condition.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 15.

CFP analysis.

More »

Fig 15 Expand