Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Technical properties of tested UASs.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Illustration of the experimental design.

(A) chronological sequence of recording phases per night (B) Test setup for each recording phase.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 2.

Categorization of bat species by echolocation group.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 2.

Sonagrams of echolocation calls categorized by Pipistrelloid, Myotini, and Nyctaloid bats.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Sonagrams of bat calls recorded during different experimental phases.

Each panel displays representative sonagrams for the echolocation groups Pipistrelloid, Myotini, and Nyctaloid.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Bat activity levels (count of 1-second recordings per 15 minutes) for each echolocation group and treatment condition.

Shown are median (line) with 25%-75% quartiles (box), smallest and largest non-outlier points (whiskers) and outlier (points). Significant differences are marked by stars (*** P < 0.001) and non-significant differences are marked by “ns”.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Cohen’s d effect sizes for the multicopter treatment across different echolocation groups.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Bat activity changes (count of 1-second files per minute) over a 15-minute period during multicopter flight for different echolocation groups; Each grey line represents one 15-minute recording period.

The red dashed line indicates the average bat activity at test minute 0 and progresses according to the estimated slope derived from the GLMER.

More »

Fig 6 Expand