Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Standardized effect size Mean Nearest Taxon Distances (ses.MNTD) for microbial communities of third instar larvae of different fly species (D. ciliatus, D. bivittatus, Z. cucurbitae) as calculated from Abundance weighted metrics.

Upper panel are estimated using the taxa.labels null model while lower panel are estimated with the independent swap model. * indicate which treatments differed significantly from 0.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Two sided t-test on A) Weighted ses.MNTD with taxa.labels null model and B) Weighted ses.MNTD with independent swap null model calculated from third instar larvae.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Intraspecific abundance weighted Standardized effect size β Mean Nearest Taxon Distances (ses.MNTD) for microbiomes.

Calculated for third instar larvae of different fly species (D. ciliatus, D. bivittatus, Z. cucurbitae). * indicate which treatments differed significantly from 0.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Intraspecific abundance weighted Raup-Cricke Bray distances (RCBray) for microbiomes.

Calculated for third instar larvae of different fly species (D. ciliatus, D. bivittatus, Z. cucurbitae). * indicate which treatments differed significantly from 0.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 2.

Two sided t-test on A) Weighted ses.βMNTD with taxa.labels null model, B) the modified Raup-Cricke Bray index.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 4.

Barplots showing A) the relative proportions of bacterial taxa that fit either the neutral model, are more prevalent than expected (Above) or less prevalent than expected (Below). B) the relative proportions of reads that belong to bacterial taxa that fit the neutral model, are more prevalent than expected (Above) or less prevalent than expected (Below).

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Taxonomic distributions of neutral, over- (Higher prevalence than expected) and underrepresented (Lower prevalence than expected) bacterial taxa for every cucurbit feeder with respect to the neutral model fit.

Above: D. bivittatus; Middle: D. ciliatus; Bottom: Z. cucurbitae.

More »

Fig 5 Expand