Table 1.
Patterns of item removal for varying values of m and n.
Fig 1.
Trace plot of MCMC estimates of ϑ.
Fig 2.
Histogram of MCMC estimates of ϑ.
Table 2.
Avg. and MSE of the MLE and BEs for ϑ at v = 0.5, δ1 = 0.25, and δ2 = 0.5 under POFIF-CS (h, m, n).
Table 3.
Avg. and MSE of the MLE and BEs for ϑ at v = 0.5, δ1 = 0.25, and δ2 = 0.5 under POFIF-CS (h, m, n).
Table 4.
Avg. and MSE of the MLE and BEs for ϑ at v = 1.5, δ1 = 1.5, and δ2 = 1.25 under POFIF-CS (h, m, n).
Table 5.
Avg. and MSE of the MLE and BEs for ϑ at v = 1.5, δ1 = 1.25, and δ2 = 1.5 under POFIF-CS (h, m, n).
Table 6.
AILs and CPs for ϑ at v = 0.5, δ1 = 0.25, and δ2 = 0.5 under POFIF-CS (h, m, n).
Table 7.
AILs and CPs for ϑ at v = 0.5, δ1 = 0.5, and δ2 = 0.25 under POFIF-CS (h, m, n).
Table 8.
AILs and CPs for ϑ at v = 1.5, δ1 = 1.5, and δ2 = 1.25 under POFIF-CS (h, m, n).
Table 9.
AILs and CPs for ϑ at v = 1.5, δ1 = 1.25, and δ2 = 1.5 under POFIF-CS (h, m, n).
Table 10.
Two datasets.
Fig 3.
The empirical distribution function and fitted distribution functions for data sets Q and T.
Table 11.
The POFIF-C samples from the real data sets.
Fig 4.
Trace plot and histogram of MCMC samples using MH algorithm.