Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Created variables and specifications.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Number of children recruited in the different years.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Relationship between age and length/height-for-age Z-score and between length/height-for-age difference and age.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 2.

Association of stunting and height deficit prevalences with age.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Weight-for height Z-score and mid-upper arm circumference based-wasting prevalence across the age groups for children included in the pooled analysis.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 3.

Association between the wasting and linear growth indicators among children included in the pooling analysis.

(N = 1393).

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Quadrant chart of change in length/height-for-age and prevalence of stunting during study participation.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Mediation analysis diagram of the association between wasting indicators and linear catch up growth.

WHZ = Weight-for-Height Z-score, MUAC = Mid-Upper Arm Circumference; Height catch-up = Positive (>0 cm) Height-for-Age Difference (HAD) change over the follow up period.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Mediation analysis diagram of the association between wasting indicators and linear catch-up growth adjusting for age, baseline height-for-age difference at recruitment, and follow up time.

WHZ = Weight-for-Height Z-score, MUAC = Mid-Upper Arm Circumference; HAD = Height-for-Age Difference; Height catch-up = Positive (>0 cm) Height-for-Age Difference change over the follow-up period.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Table 4.

Direct, indirect, and total effects of the path model variables in Figs 5 and 6 estimated by linear regression using the maximum likelihood approach.

More »

Table 4 Expand