Fig 1.
Protective clothing design development process based on the Kano-QFD-PUGH method.
Table 1.
Functional requirements analysis table (Source: Adapted from Han Wei et al., 2020).
Table 2.
Five-point Likert scale (Source: Adapted from Luo Zheng qing et al., 2002).
Table 3.
KANO evaluation table (Source: Adapted from Kano et al., 1984).
Table 4.
Classification of design requirements KANO attributes (Source: Author’s own research).
Table 5.
Results of the Better-Worse index analysis for each indicator (Source: Author’s own research).
Fig 2.
(A: Exciting demand; O: Desired demand; I: Non-differentiated needs; M: Basic needs).
Table 6.
Impact results of the Kano demand analysis (Source: Author’s own research).
Table 7.
Quality planning table for demand elements (Source: Author’s own research).
Table 8.
Protective clothing design build quality house (Source: Author’s own research).
Fig 3.
Diagram of the four conceptual design options (Drawn by the author).
Table 9.
Overall rating for protective clothing design (Source: Author’s own research).
Fig 4.
Original protective clothing design (Source web).
Fig 5.
Conceptual design of medical protective clothing based on user needs (Drawn by the author).
Fig 6.
Radar diagram of medical protective clothing based on user needs.
Table 10.
Changes in design satisfaction for medical protective clothing (Source: Adapted from Wang Jun et al., 2023).