Table 1.
Descriptive statistics of the clinical trial data used in this study.
Table 2.
Games in mind frontier.
Fig 1.
Average sessions of different games in previous two weeks (a) and in whole trial (b).
Table 3.
Data obtained through gamified cognitive training interactions.
Table 4.
Calculation of composite scores using z-scores.
Table 5.
P-values between the variables and 10-week adherence at minimal and full levels.
Fig 2.
Line Graph Illustrating the Average Predictive Performance of Different Models for Minimal (a) and Full Adherence (b); Note: The blue line represents average model accuracy using game performance predictors. The orange line indicates accuracy/AUROC from models with baseline predictors: composite score and z-scores.
Fig 3.
Comparative Analysis of Classification Models Using Game Performance Metrics to Predict Levels of Adherence: (a) Minimal Adherence, and (b) Full Adherence.
Table 6.
Comparative performance metrics of base models and ensemble model.
Table 7.
SHAP value analysis of game performance predictors across seven games.