Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Sex and age distribution of the training dataset.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Sex and age distribution of the testing dataset.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Distribution by sex and age on PC1 and PC2.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

The examples of medial clavicles of younger persons located at the third and fourth quadrants of Fig 3 (shades of blue).

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

The examples of medial clavicles aged 40–55 years located in the second quadrant of Fig 3 (shades of green).

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

The examples of medial clavicles of persons older than 80 years on Fig 3 (shades of yellow).

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Table 1.

The classification performance of models on the cross-validation sample with pp = 0.5.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 7.

SVM–incorrectly classified clavicles on cross-validation sample with pp = 0.5.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

LR—incorrectly classified clavicles on cross-validation sample with pp = 0.5.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

NNI—SGD—incorrectly classified clavicles on cross-validation sample with pp = 0.5.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Table 2.

Performance of the classification models on test sample (n = 40) with pp = 0.5.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 10.

Incorrectly classified clavicles in test samples with SVM, LR, and NNI–SGD.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Table 3.

Classification performance of models on cross-validation sample with pp = 0.95.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 11.

SVM, LR, and NNI–SGD—incorrectly classified clavicles on cross-validation sample with pp = 0.95.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Table 4.

Classification performance of the models on test sample (n = 40) with pp = 0.95.

More »

Table 4 Expand