Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Log CFU reduction of E. coli, L. innocua, and S. enterica varying pulsing conditions, contact times, and concentrations of hydrogen peroxide.

Data presented as average of triplicate analysis with error bars representing standard deviation. Statistical differences from Tukey’s multiple comparisons test are presented as (ns) P > 0.05, * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, **** P < 0.0001.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Bacterial inactivation of E. coli, L. innocua, and S. enterica based on CFU determination.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Comparison of inactivation using individual treatments and the combination H2O2/PEF treatment.

All data represents the average of triplicate analysis, error bars represent standard deviation. Statistical significance from Tukey’s multiple comparisons test; (ns) P > 0.05, * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, **** P < 0.0001a E. coli treatment conditions: 0.1% H2O2, 15 min contact time, split-dose PEF (500+500P). b L. innocua treatment conditions: 0.3% H2O2, 45 min contact time, split-dose PEF (500+500P). c S. enterica treatment conditions: 0.5% H2O2, 45 min contact time, split-dose PEF (500+500P).

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Change in log reductions of different bacteria after varying time delays between two trains of 500, 600 ns pulses at 21 kV/cm in the absence of H2O2.

The delay times between trains of PEF were selected to correlate with the contact times evaluated for combination treatments. A delay time of 0 represents a single train of 1000 pulses. Data is presented as the average of triplicate analysis with error bars representing standard deviation. Statistical differences from one-way ANOVA are presented as (ns) P > 0.05, * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, **** P < 0.0001.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Difference in log CFU reductions in bacterial load between split-dose (SD) and single train (ST) exposures for bacteria.

Positive values represent enhanced log CFU reduction for split-dose PEF compared to single train exposures, negative values represent enhanced log CFU reduction for single train PEF exposures compared to split-dose exposures.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Flowchart outlining the primary experimental procedures.

More »

Fig 5 Expand