Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Technical approach.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Genetic algorithm flowchart.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Stacking schematic diagram.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 1.

Data set presentation.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 4.

Pearson correlation coefficient matrix plot.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Partial results of the chi-square test.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Table 2.

Confusion matrix.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 6.

Demonstration of data imbalance.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Table 3.

Performance comparison of different adoption algorithms in XGBoost model.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Comparison of results from various classification models.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 7.

Comparison of ROC curves for various classification models.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Genetic algorithm iteration data chart.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

The Search process of the genetic algorithm.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Table 5.

Comparison of XGBoost hyperparameter tuning optimization results.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Fig 10.

Flowchart of stacking model integration.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Fig 11.

Stacking confusion matrix.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Fig 12.

Stacking ROC curve chart.

More »

Fig 12 Expand

Table 6.

Prediction results of the stacking model.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Fig 13.

Comparison chart of ROC curves for multiple models.

More »

Fig 13 Expand

Table 7.

Comparison of prediction results from multiple models.

More »

Table 7 Expand

Fig 14.

SHAP of stacking.

More »

Fig 14 Expand

Fig 15.

GA-XGBoost model SHAP feature density scatter plot.

More »

Fig 15 Expand

Fig 16.

SHAP summary plot of feature importance ranking of GA-XGBoost model.

More »

Fig 16 Expand

Fig 17.

GA-XGBoost feature importances.

More »

Fig 17 Expand