Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Position of cognition in language activities defined by SFL.

(Adapted from Kato et al. [11]) This figure illustrates the SFL hierarchy enhanced by Kato’s cognition layer addition [11]. It demonstrates how culture and situation shape lexicogrammatical choices via Field, Tenor, and Mode, thereby impacting communication. The diagram underscores the importance of cognition in selecting suitable lexicogrammar for successful social interactions.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Overview of demographic and clinical metrics in AS vs. non-AS populations.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Distribution of AS and co-occurring conditions.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Indicative sentence type of the system network.

This figure presents a close-up of the segment highlighted by the red circle in the MOOD system (S1 Fig 1 in S1 File for context). It illustrates the progression of delicacy in mood selection choices, moving from left to right across the network.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 2.

Tag types and linguistic functions.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 4.

Procedure for automatic AS differentiation experiments using leave-one-out cross validation (LOOCV).

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Bi-LSTM-based classification model using tags.

The term Middle signifies a type of verb that lacks agency from a perspective, while Usuality indicates how often an event tends to occur. Additional explanation is provided in Table 2. Both these selective resources are embedded in the system network.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Bi-LSTM-based classification model that utilizes tag-and-text.

An example sentence is Oko ttari nanka surukoto aru (There are occasions when I get mad). The assigned tags are the same as in Fig 5.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Table 3.

Statistical values of linear and DNN-based models.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

McNemar test results for model performance comparisons.

More »

Table 4 Expand