Fig 1.
Comparison of data volume in different studies.
Fig 2.
Research process flowchart.
Table 1.
Comparison of influencing factors considered in different studies.
Table 2.
Dataset.
Table 3.
Statistical parameters of the data set.
Table 4.
Relationship between variables and model parameters.
Table 5.
Oxide composition of fly ash (%).
Table 6.
Mixture proportion for experimental verification.
Fig 3.
System boundary of CO2 emissions assessment.
Fig 4.
Relationship between density ρNS and mass fraction PNaOH,NS of NaOH solution.
Fig 5.
Comparison between the testing set’s observations and the three model’s predictions.
Fig 6.
Comparison between the validation set’s observations and the three model’s predictions.
Fig 7.
Effects of Na/Al, Si/Al, H2O/FA, C/FA, F/FA, T, t1, and t2 on compressive strength.
Fig 8.
GUI of the program of the optimal FAGC mixture design.
Table 7.
Design results of FAGC.