Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Block diagram of the proposed abnormal EEG signal detection framework.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Detailed description of the TUH Abnormal EEG dataset utilized in this study.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Flowchart of EEG preprocessing.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Distribution of the 21 EEG electrodes according to 10–20 system.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Time-frequency feature extraction on raw EEG signals using discrete wavelet transform.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Process of feature aggregation.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Performance of three classifiers.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Table 2.

Confusion matrix of EEG detection.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 7.

Confusion matrices of three classifiers.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Table 3.

Comparison of the classification results obtained by different EEG pathology diagnosis approaches on the real-world EEG abnormal dataset.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Ablation study of multi-view feature aggregation.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 8.

Heatmap of p-values for time-frequency features aggregated across activity, mobility, and complexity dimensions.

The color intensity in the heatmap corresponds to the p-value size, representing feature statistical significance for classification.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Performance of three classifiers (without spatial features).

More »

Fig 9 Expand