Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Primer sequence of tumor associated macrophage (TAM) marker.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Clinical information of 148 WT patients.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 1.

Recruitment of TAM in WT and paracancerous tissue.

(A-C) mRNA expression of M2 TAM markers; (D) mRNA expression of total macrophage marker; (E-F) mRNA expression of M1 TAM markers (*p<0.05; **p<0.01; p<0.05 was considered statistically significant).

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

IF detection of TAM recruitment in Wilms tumor tissue.

(A) Representative immunofluorescence images of CD68, CD163, and CD86 staining in WT tissue sections; (B) Recruitment of CD68+CD163+M2 macrophages in Wilms tumor of non-chemotherapy group; (C) Recruitment of CD68+CD86+M1 macrophages in Wilms tumor of non-chemotherapy group; (D) Recruitment of CD68+CD163+M2 macrophages in Wilms tumor of chemotherapy group; (E) Recruitment of CD68+CD86+M1 macrophages in Wilms tumor of chemotherapy group (Red: overall macrophage Mtotal; Green: Figure B and D are M2 macrophages, Figure C and E are M1 macrophages) (50 μm Ruler).

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

The recruitment difference of TAM in different stages WT tissue.

(A-C) The recruitment difference of TAM in different stages WT in the non-chemotherapy group; (D) The recruitment difference of overall macrophage Mtotal in WT tissue of the chemotherapy group; (E-G) The recruitment difference of TAM in WT tissues between non-chemotherapy and chemotherapy group during the same stage (*p<0.05; **p<0.01; p<0.05 was considered statistically significant).

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 3.

The recruitment difference of TAM in WT of non-chemotherapy group.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

The recruitment difference of overall macrophage Mtotal in WT tissues of the chemotherapy group.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

The recruitment difference of M1 and M2 in WT tissue of the chemotherapy group.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Fig 4.

Survival curve of WT.

(A-C) The relationship between TAM recruitment and prognosis of WT patients in non-chemotherapy group; (D-F) The relationship between TAM recruitment and prognosis of WT patients in chemotherapy group (p<0.05 was considered statistically significant).

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 6.

COX multivariate regression analyzed prognostic factors in WT patients of non-chemotherapy group.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

COX multivariate regression analyzed prognostic factors in WT patients of chemotherapy group.

More »

Table 7 Expand