Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Study area.

Republished from<Identification and influencing factors of gully activity in the Sunshui river basin> under a CC BY license, with permission from China West Normal University, original copyright 2003.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

The processed DEM map of the study area.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Data acquisition process.

The filling color block unit is the basic morphological parameter.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

NDVI map of study area.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Land use type map of Sunshui River basin.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Table 1.

Land use classification.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Trapezoidal function.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Subordinate function of gully activity under different VC(%).

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Subordinate function of gully activity under different slopes.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Classification of gully activity under different MBGR.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Activity index of 71 gullies in the study area.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Fig 6.

Schematic representation of the level of gully activity.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Table 7.

Empirical judgment results and comparison.

More »

Table 7 Expand

Table 8.

Topographic index values of gullies with different activity levels.

More »

Table 8 Expand

Fig 7.

Map of each influence factor.

(a-c) The aspect map, (d-f) The topographic relief map, (g-i) The surface roughness map, (j-l) The surface curvature map.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

The correlation between gully activity and influence factors.

TR represents topographic relief, SR represents surface roughness, As represents slope aspect, LUT represents land use type, SC represents surface curvature and AI represents activity index.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Distribution characteristics of gully activity index on LUTs, TR and SC.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

The relationship between activity index and VC (a), slope (b), and MBGR (c).

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Table 9.

Descriptive data and difference test of activity of each evaluation factor.

More »

Table 9 Expand