Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Sample item of the Computational Thinking Test (CTt).

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Practice item of the SPOT test.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Practice items of the SAM test.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 1.

Descriptive statistics of CTt and adaptive performance tests (SPOT, SAM, and NoVo).

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 4.

The distribution of CTt scores in men and women.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

The distribution of SAM and SPOT scores in men and women.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Table 2.

Tests of gender differences in CTt, SPOT, SAM, and NoVo scores.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Correlations between CTt, SAM, SPOT, NoVo, and gender.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 6.

Conceptual diagram of the research model.

Notes. **: p < .01; ***: p < .001; ns: Not statistically significant. SPOT: Visuo-Spatial Ability; SAM: Fluid intelligence (Scrambled Adaptive Matrices); CTt: Computational Thinking test performance. Paths from the covariant (C) to the mediators are omitted to promote readability (each path not stat. sig.).

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Table 4.

Regression parameters and summary of the research model.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Tests of indirect effects of gender on CTt.

More »

Table 5 Expand