Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Quadcopter configuration.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Throttle.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Roll.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Pitch.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Yaw.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Block diagram of the proposed control strategy.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Table 1.

Fuzzy rules for error and PID sliding surface parameters.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Fuzzy rules for sliding surface and super twisting algorithm parameters.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Parameters of the quadcopter.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 7.

Trajectory tracking for x-axis in spiral infinity path.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Trajectory tracking for y-axis in spiral infinity path.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Trajectory tracking for z-axis in spiral infinity path.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

3D trajectory tracking of a spiral infinity path.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Fig 11.

Trajectory tracking for x-axis in a square wave path.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Fig 12.

Trajectory tracking for y-axis in a square wave path.

More »

Fig 12 Expand

Fig 13.

Trajectory tracking for z-axis in a square wave path.

More »

Fig 13 Expand

Fig 14.

3D trajectory tracking of a square wave path.

More »

Fig 14 Expand

Fig 15.

Trajectory tracking for x-axis in a ramp helix path.

More »

Fig 15 Expand

Fig 16.

Trajectory tracking for y-axis in a ramp helix path.

More »

Fig 16 Expand

Fig 17.

Trajectory tracking for z-axis in a ramp helix path.

More »

Fig 17 Expand

Fig 18.

Trajectory tracking for psi in a ramp helix path.

More »

Fig 18 Expand

Fig 19.

3D trajectory tracking of a ramp helix path.

More »

Fig 19 Expand

Fig 20.

Disturbance rejection capacity of the proposed controller for the x-axis.

More »

Fig 20 Expand

Fig 21.

Disturbance rejection capacity of the proposed controller for the y-axis.

More »

Fig 21 Expand

Fig 22.

Disturbance rejection capacity of the proposed controller for the z-axis.

More »

Fig 22 Expand

Fig 23.

Parameter variation handling capacity of the proposed controller for the x-axis.

More »

Fig 23 Expand

Fig 24.

Parameter variation handling capacity of the proposed controller for the y-axis.

More »

Fig 24 Expand

Fig 25.

Parameter variation handling capacity of the proposed controller for the z-axis.

More »

Fig 25 Expand

Fig 26.

3D parameter variation handling capability of the proposed controller.

More »

Fig 26 Expand

Fig 27.

Tracking response for the x-axis.

More »

Fig 27 Expand

Fig 28.

Tracking response for the y-axis.

More »

Fig 28 Expand

Fig 29.

Tracking response for the z-axis.

More »

Fig 29 Expand

Fig 30.

Altitude controller effort of quadcopter.

More »

Fig 30 Expand

Fig 31.

Attitude controller u2 effort for quadcopter.

More »

Fig 31 Expand

Fig 32.

Attitude controller u3 effort for quadcopter.

More »

Fig 32 Expand

Table 4.

IAE for t = 30 seconds.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

ITE for t = 30 seconds.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

ISE for t = 30 seconds.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

ITSE for t = 30 seconds.

More »

Table 7 Expand

Table 8.

Force and Torque for t = 30 seconds.

More »

Table 8 Expand