Fig 1.
Three experimental conditions (synchronous movement, no-movement, and unpredictable movement) Experiment 1 compared synchronous movement and no movement and Experiment 2 compared all three conditions.
Fig 2.
Comfort distance task where participants indicated discomfort as agents approached their avatar.
Distances at which participants stopped the agents were recorded to measure comfort distance judgements.
Fig 3.
Results from Experiment 1 showing Inclusion of Other in Self (IOS) scores (left) and mean comfort distances (right) for synchronous movement and no-movement conditions.
Error bars represent standard errors.
Fig 4.
Experiment 2 Results self-other blurring (IOS scores) (left) and mean comfort distance judgements (right) across synchronous movement, no-movement, and unpredictable movement conditions.
Error bars represent standard errors.
Fig 5.
Correlation plots for Experiment 1 (left) and Experiment 2 (right) between self-other blurring (IOS scores) and comfort distance judgements.