Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Summary statistics.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Mean t-test of control variables.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Impact of the UTC policy on women’s income.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 1.

Common trend test.

Notes: Taking the previous period before the policy (2014) as a comparison, "Previous2" corresponds to 2012, "Current" corresponds to 2016, "Post1" corresponds to 2018, and "Post2" corresponds to 2020.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 4.

Common trend test.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 2.

Placebo test.

Notes: The dashed line corresponds to the estimated policy impact in the baseline regression.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 5.

Robustness tests.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Mediation analysis.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Fig 3.

Heterogeneity analysis (Age group).

Notes: The fig plots point estimates and 90% confidence intervals for the effect of variables on women’s employment income.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Heterogeneity analysis (Education group).

Notes: The fig plots point estimates and 90% confidence intervals for the effect of variables on women’s employment income.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 7.

Heterogeneity analysis.

More »

Table 7 Expand