Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Flow chart.

EF: ejection fraction.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of patients studied.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Correlation between auto-EF or visual LVEF and EF estimated by MRI.

A: Correlation between Auto-EF and LVEF estimated by MRI. B: Bland & Altman plot of Auto-EF and LVEF estimated by MRI. C: Correlation between visual LVEF and LVEF estimated by MRI. D: Bland & Altman plot of visual LVEF and LVEF estimated by MRI. PUD: pocket ultrasound device; EF: ejection fraction; LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction; MRI: magnetic resonance imaging; SD: standard deviation.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Correlation between MAPSE or Sa and LVEF estimated by MRI.

A: Correlation between MAPSE and LVEF estimated by MRI. B: Correlation between Sa and LVEF estimated by MRI. MAPSE: mitral annular plane systolic excursion; Sa: peak systolic mitral annular velocity; LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction; MRI: magnetic resonance imaging.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 2.

Concordance between auto-EF, visual estimating, MAPSE, Sa and by cardiac MRI for classification into three stages of heart failure.

More »

Table 2 Expand