Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Coring information.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Part of the core used for testing.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

MTS815 flex test GT.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Flow chart of installation.

(a) Sample with sensor mounting, (b) Sample under load.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Method for evaluating brittleness based on characteristics of stress-strain curves.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Brittleness evaluation of Lu211 well (stress strain method).

Longyi-14: 1-0-1, Longyi-13: 2-0-2, Longyi-12: 3-0-1, Longyi-11: 6-0-1, Wufeng: 8-0-2, Baota: 9-0-2.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Brittleness index trend graph with depth (stress strain method).

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Table 2.

Rock mechanics parameters of Lu211 well under triaxial compression.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 7.

Brittleness evaluation based on energy dissipation method.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Brittleness evaluation of Lu211 well (energy dissipation method).

Longyi-14: 1-0-1, Longyi-13: 2-0-2, Longyi-12: 3-0-1, Longyi-11: 6-0-1, Wufeng: 8-0-2.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Table 3.

Summary of rock brittleness evaluation of Lu211 well (energy dissipation method).

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 9.

Brittleness index with depth (energy dissipation method).

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Table 4.

Mineral components of Lu211 well.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 10.

Brittleness index with depth (mineral component method).

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Fig 11.

A brittleness evaluation method considering multiple methods.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Fig 12.

Curve fitting plot.

(a)Stress-strain method, (b)Energy dissipation method, (c)Mineral component method.

More »

Fig 12 Expand

Table 5.

Sensitivity coefficient normalization.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Fig 13.

Brittleness evaluation method considering multiple factors.

More »

Fig 13 Expand