Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Framework block diagram of the G-Net.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Squeeze Excitation module when a single image passes through.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 1.

Description and rationale of various blocks.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Purpose, integration mechanism, and benefits of G-Net.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Description of dataset.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 3.

MRI sequences as 2D sections.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 4.

Performance comparison of G-Net for different epochs.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Performance comparisons of Subclass tumor using Brats 2020.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Performance comparisons of subclass tumor using Brats 2021.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

Comparison of G-Net with existing techniques on BraTS2020.

More »

Table 7 Expand

Fig 4.

Accuracy, loss when trained for 18 epoch.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Precision, sensitivity and specificity when trained for 18 epoch.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Accuracy, loss when trained for 50 epoch.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Precision, sensitivity and specificity when trained for 50 epoch.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Performance comparison of accuracy, precision, sensitivity, specificity for 18 and 50 epochs.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Performance comparison of loss, tversky loss, boundary loss for 18 and 50 epochs.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

Illustration presented below displays the qualitative outcomes of the G-Net model applied to BraTS2020.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Fig 11.

Following visualization showcases the results of the G-Net over existing models ([5, 10, 11, 18, 42, 44]) on BraTS2020.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Table 8.

Model integration and performance analysis of G-Net.

More »

Table 8 Expand