Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Analysis inclusion.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Evaluated case definitions for the identification of severe wasting.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Overlap between severe wasting, severe underweight, and MUAC <115 mm in different age groups.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Overlap between stunting, severe wasting, severe underweight, and MUAC <11.5 cm in different age groups.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 2.

Nutritional status of the study population by different anthropometric indicators.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Optimal Mid-Upper Arm Circumference cut-off for the diagnosis of severe wasting in children under five years and their corresponding accuracy characteristics by age groups and gender.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Diagnostic accuracy of selected practical cut-offs of Mid-Upper Arm Circumference for the diagnosis of severe wasting.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Diagnostic test accuracy parameters for various case definitions combining different mid-upper arm circumference cut-offs and the indicator of severe underweight in diagnosing severe wasting among underfive children.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Diagnostic accuracy of the case definition combining Mid-Upper Arm Circumference below 130 millimeters and weight-for-age Z-score below minus 3 Z-score in diagnosing severe wasting among under-five children according to sex and stuntedness.

More »

Table 6 Expand