Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Location of case study.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Basic information on the carbon emissions dataset.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Flowchart of MDL model.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 2.

ADF test results of industrial carbon emission series in Xinjiang.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Basic structure of LSTM.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 3.

Emission factors for different energy varieties.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Hyperparameter settings during model training.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Prediction results of different methods for industrial carbon emissions in Xinjiang.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Number of model training iterations.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Fig 4.

Comparison of performance of different models on RMSE.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Comparison of performance of different models on MAE.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Comparison of performance of different models on SMAPE.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Table 7.

Mean values of evaluation indicators of each model under different prediction ranges.

More »

Table 7 Expand

Fig 7.

Performance comparison between MAML_LSTM and MDL.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Table 8.

Percentage of performance increase or decrease in each metric for D_LSTM vs. DML.

More »

Table 8 Expand

Fig 8.

Comparison between LSTM and MAML_LSTM in terms of number of iterations.

More »

Fig 8 Expand