Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Proposed CAD system framework.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Anisotropic filtering result.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Proposed segmentation framework.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Feature extraction & reduction framework.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 1.

Features and formulas.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 5.

Proposed tumor detection & localization framework.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Proposed 11-layer AlexNet-CNN framework for classification.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Table 2.

Proposed AlexNet-CNN 11 layers details.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Tools requirements and system specification.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 7.

Dataset of CT images for pancreatic cancer.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Table 4.

Pancreatic tumor CTs images dataset details.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 8.

Proposed GUI-based CAD system for PC Tumor.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Table 5.

Comparative results of watershed vs. U-Net segmentation in pancreatic tumor detection.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Fig 9.

System performance metrics for tumor detection.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

Pancreatic tumor detection results.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Fig 11.

Comparison chart of performance metrics with other models for tumor detection.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Fig 12.

Comparison graph of performance evaluation with other models for tumor detection.

More »

Fig 12 Expand

Table 6.

Detection performance metrics comparison of proposed and other models.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Fig 13.

System performance metrics for tumor classification.

More »

Fig 13 Expand

Fig 14.

Pancreatic tumor classification results.

More »

Fig 14 Expand

Fig 15.

Comparison chart of performance metrics with other models for tumor classification.

More »

Fig 15 Expand

Fig 16.

Comparison graph of performance evaluation with other models for tumor classification.

More »

Fig 16 Expand

Table 7.

Classification performance metrics comparison of proposed and other models.

More »

Table 7 Expand

Fig 17.

A. Training and validation Chart of accuracy and loss. B. Training and validation Chart of accuracy and loss.

More »

Fig 17 Expand

Fig 18.

ROC curve for tumor classification.

More »

Fig 18 Expand

Table 8.

AlexNet-CNN model training and validation details.

More »

Table 8 Expand