Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

The membership functions of the IT2FSs.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Interval type 2 trapezoid fuzzy membership functions.

(a: related to opinion b: related to confidence).

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 1.

Linguistic terms and their corresponding IT2FSs [51].

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 3.

Work flow diagram of proposed method.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

The link between barriers and how they affect the consequences based on the SHIPP theory.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 2.

Weighting scores of various experts [66].

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Calculation weighting factors for 20 experts.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 5.

Fault tree of gas release in spherical tank.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Table 4.

The basic events of fault tree and their symbols.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 6.

Fault tree of release prevention barrier (RPB) failure.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Fault tree of dispersion prevention barrier (DPB) failure.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Fault tree of ignition prevention barrier (IPB) failure.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Fault tree of escalation prevention barrier (EPB) failure.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

Fault tree of human factor barrier (HFB) failure and management &organizational barrier(M&OB) failure.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Table 5.

The symbols and descriptions of basic event of barriers’ failure fault tree.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

FPS and FFP values of the basic events of the top event fault tree based on IT2FS-Z.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

FPS and FFP values of the basic events of the top event fault tree based on IT2FS.

More »

Table 7 Expand

Table 8.

FPS and FFP values of the basic events in the barrier failure fault tree based on IT2FS-Z.

More »

Table 8 Expand

Table 9.

FPS and FFP values of the basic events in the barrier failure fault tree based on IT2FS.

More »

Table 9 Expand

Fig 11.

Comparison between probability of BEs calculated using IT2FS-Z and IT2FS in FTA.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Fig 12.

Comparison between probability of BEs calculated using IT2FS-Z and IT2FS in ETA.

More »

Fig 12 Expand

Fig 13.

BN mapping from bow-tie (“a” is fault tree side of bowtie. “b” is event tree side with fault trees of barriers failure).

More »

Fig 13 Expand

Fig 14.

a: Prior probability of barrier failure. b: Prior probability of consequences.

More »

Fig 14 Expand

Table 10.

Prior and probability of barriers failure and consequences based on BN.

More »

Table 10 Expand

Fig 15.

a: Tornado graph displaying the top fifteen CBEs in the IT2FS-Z BN. b: Tornado graph displaying the top fifteen CBEs in the IT2FS BN.

More »

Fig 15 Expand

Table 11.

Five-year cumulative table of CBE-related failures and successes.

More »

Table 11 Expand

Table 12.

The posterior probability of CBEs over the FIVE years.

More »

Table 12 Expand

Table 13.

The posterior probability of barriers failure based on beta distribution and BN.

More »

Table 13 Expand

Table 14.

The posterior probability of consequences based on beta distribution and Bayesian network.

More »

Table 14 Expand

Fig 16.

The prior and the posterior probability of the CBEs.

(a: IT2FS. b: IT2FS-Z).

More »

Fig 16 Expand

Fig 17.

The posterior probability of barriers failure.

(A: RPB. B: DPB. C: IPB. D: EPB).

More »

Fig 17 Expand

Fig 18.

The posterior probability of consequences.

(A: Near miss. B: mishap. C: Incident. D: Accident).

More »

Fig 18 Expand

Fig 19.

The posterior probability of the consequences in different calculations, except for IT2FS(VAR = 10−4) (A: Near miss. B: mishap. C: Incident. D: Accident).

More »

Fig 19 Expand