Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Primer pairs for real-time PCR.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

USP26 expression is significantly increased during EV71 infection.

(A) Differential gene expression of human DUBs in RD cells infected with EV71 after 8 h were analyzed by PCR microarray. (B) RT-qPCR analysis of the USP26 mRNA levels in RD cells infected by EV71 (MOI = 1.0) at different time points. (C) Western blot analysis of the expression of USP26 and EV71/VP1 in RD cells infected by EV71 (MOI = 1.0) at different time points. The independent experiments were performed in triplicate. (D) Data were shown relative to GAPDH expression and are presented as the mean ± SD from three independent experiments. NS, not significant P>0.05, *P<0.05, ** P<0.01 and *** P<0.001.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

USP26 depletion inhibits EV71 infection.

(A, B) Western blot (A) and RT-qPCR (B) analysis of USP26 levels in RD cells transfected with control SiRNA (SiNC) or USP26-specific SiRNAs (SiUSP26, #1, #2 and #3) for 48 h. (C) Western blot analysis of EV71 protein levels in RD cells transfected with SiNC or SiUSP26(#2) and then infected by EV71 (MOI = 1.0) for different times. (D) RT-qPCR analysis of EV71-VP1 RNA levels in RD cells transfected with SiNC or SiUSP26 (#2) and then infected by EV71 (MOI = 1.0) for indicated times. (E) Viral titers of EV71 in RD cells with stable knockdown of USP26 were analyzed. (F) CCK8 analysis of RD cell survival after infection with EV71 (MOI = 1.0) for the indicated times. The cell survival rates at 0 h time points were normalized as 100%. (G) CCK8 analysis of RD cells survival after infection with different amount of EV71. The cell survival rates when MOI = 0 was normalized as 100%. Data were shown as the mean ± SD from three independent experiments. NS, not significant P>0.05 * P<0.05, ** P<0.01 and *** P<0.001. The independent experiments were performed in triplicate.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Knocking down USP26 results in the upregulation of type I IFN production.

RD cells transfected with knockdown of USP26 or SiNC were infected with EV71(MOI = 1.0) or transfection with Poly (I:C) at 12h. (A-D) Luciferase assay was performed to analyze regulation of IFN-β, ISER, NF-κB and IRF3 promoter by knockdown of USP26. (E-H) The expression of IFN-β, ISG15, MX1 and Viperin mRNA levels were analyzed by RT-qPCR. (I) Western blot analysis of RD cells infected with EV71 for different duration of time, The cell lysates were analysed by immunoblotting using anti-pIRF3, anti-IRF3 and anti- GAPDH antibodies respectively. (J) Western blot analysis of p-IRF3 (pSer396-IRF3), total IRF3, TRAF3, TRAF6 levels in RD cells with knockdown of USP26 that were infected with EV71 (MOI = 1.0) at the indicated time. (K) RT-qPCR analysis of IFNβ mRNA levels in RD cells with knockdown of USP26 that infected with EV71 (MOI = 1.0) at the indicated time. (L) ELISA analysis of the IFN-β protein levels in RD cells with stable knockdown of USP26 that infected with EV71 (MOI = 1.0) at the indicated time. Data were shown relative to GAPDH expression and are presented as the mean ± SD from three independent experiments. NS, not significant P>0.05, ** P<0.01 and *** P<0.001. The independent experiments were performed in triplicate.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

USP26-deficient mice were resistant to virus infection.

WT and USP26-/- mice were infected with EV71 virus (1 × 107 PFU per mouse). (A) Survival rate of WT and USP26-/- mice after EV71 infection for indicated time. (B) Viral EV71 VP1 mRNA was determined by RT-qPCR. (C) Viral titres of EV71 virus were determined. (E) Expression of IFN-β and IL-6 was determined by qPCR. (D-G) Expression of IFN-β, ISG15, MX1 and Viperin were determined by RT-qPCR. (H) Serum levels of IFN-β was determined by ELISA at 3 days post infection. Data shown are the mean ±SD. NS, not significant P>0.05, ** P<0.01 and *** P<0.001. Data are representative of three independent experiments with similar results.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

USP26 can interact with TRAF3.

(A-G) Co-immunoprecipitation analysis of the interaction between USP26 and the key components of RIG-I/MAVS signaling. HEK293T cells were transfected with Flag-RIG-I or Flag-MDA5 or Flag-MAVS or Flag-TRAF6 or Flag-TRAF3 or Flag-TBK1 or Flag-IRF3, and immunoprecipitated with anti-Flag agarose beads. The eluted immunocomplex was then subjected to SDS-PAGE analysis with anti-USP26 antibody. (H) Co-immunoprecipitation analysis the interaction between endogenous USP26 and TRAF3 in HEK293T cells. The independent experiments were performed in triplicate.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

USP26 decreases the polyubiquitination of TRAF3.

(A) Western blot analysis of HEK293T cells transfected with Flag-TRAF3, HA-USP26 and HA-Ub for cellular ubiquitination levels; GAPDH was used as a loading control. (B) HEK293T cells transfected with Flag-TRAF3, HA-Ub, together with wild-type HA-USP26 were collected and immunoprecipitated with anti-Flag agarose beads. The eluted immunocomplex was then subjected to SDS-PAGE analysis with antiubiquitin antibody. (C) Western blot analysis of RD cells transfected with knockdown of USP26 or SiNC for 48 h, followed by treatment with EV71 (MOI = 1) for 12 h. The cell lysates were subjected to immunoprecipitation with anti-TRAF3 antibody, followed by western blot analysis of eluted immunocomplex with K63 linkage-specific ubiquitin antibodies.

More »

Fig 6 Expand