Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Simulation schemes.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Mechanical parameters.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 1.

Calculation model diagram.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Stress-strain curves under different rock bridge angles.

(a) 100 mm, (b) 150 mm, (c) 200 mm, (d) 250 mm, (e) 300 mm, (f) 350 mm, (g) 400 mm.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Stress-strain curves under different sizes.

(a)15°, (b) 30°, (c) 45°, (d) 60°, (e) 75°.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 3.

E50 values.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Fitting curve of E50.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 4.

Fitting curve of rock E50.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Fit curve graph.

(a) a, (b) b.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Table 5.

Constants a and b.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Fitting curves of E50.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Table 6.

Fitting relationship of E50.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Fit curve graph.

(a) c, (b) d.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Table 7.

Parameters c and d.

More »

Table 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Variation law of E50 fluctuation coefficient (a) angle, (b) size.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Table 8.

E50 fluctuation coefficient.

More »

Table 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Fitting curve between CSSM and angle.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Table 9.

Characteristic size values.

More »

Table 9 Expand

Fig 10.

Fitting curve of CSM and rock bridge angle.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Table 10.

CSM.

More »

Table 10 Expand

Fig 11.

stress-strain curves.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Table 11.

E50 values of size.

More »

Table 11 Expand

Table 12.

E50 values of angle.

More »

Table 12 Expand

Fig 12.

Curve fitting of E50.

More »

Fig 12 Expand