Fig 1.
Distribution of the phylogroups among Escherichia coli isolated from pork (PEC) and urine (UPEC) of patients with urinary tract infections (UTIs) in Thailand.
Fig 2.
The distribution of uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) virulence-associated genes of E. coli from pork (PEC) and urine (UPEC) of patients with urinary tract infections (UTIs) in Thailand.
Table 1.
Frequencies of virulence factors associated with uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) in the phylogroups among Escherichia coli isolated from pork (PEC) and urine (UPEC) of patients with urinary tract infections (UTIs) in Thailand.
Table 2.
Uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) virulence gene patterns among phylogroups of 330 Escherichia coli from pork (PEC) and urine (UPEC) of patients with urinary tract infections (UTIs) in Thailand.
Fig 3.
UPGMA clustering analysis of 330 Escherichia coli from pork (PEC) and urine (UPEC) of patients with urinary tract infections (UTIs) in Thailand.
The dendrogram was constructed based on phylogroups and presence/absence of uropathogenic E. coli (UPEC) and diarrheagenic E. coli (DEC) virulence-associated genes. Asterisks indicate PEC and UPEC were found in the same lineage. Black or white circles represent strains from pork or urine, respectively. Groups of the same profile strains are collapsed and shown proportionately to the number of strains in that lineage. White or black boxes indicate the absence or presence of virulence genes, respectively. No cut-off value was defined; clustering was based on total differences found.