Table 1.
Use of the SPIDER framework to define the search terms for the qualitative synthesis.
Table 2.
Search strategy used for qualitative systematic review.
Table 3.
Inclusion and exclusion criteria used for screening of articles.
Table 4.
Domains from the pre-existing conceptual model, including detailed definitions, which make up the ‘a priori’ coding framework.
Table 5.
Description of ‘Best fit’ framework synthesis and accompanying thematic analysis.
Fig 1.
PRISMA diagram describing the process of identifying, screening and selecting articles for inclusion in the qualitative synthesis.
Table 6.
Summary of study aim and sample characteristics from papers included in the qualitative synthesis.
Fig 2.
Map of the world illustrating the geographical spread of participants involved in the included studies.
Table 7.
Study design and critical appraisal of study quality using the CASP qualitative appraisal tool (Yes = Light grey (1), Can’t Tell = Dark Grey (2), No = Black(3)).
Table 8.
Examples of how data from the qualitative synthesis support the pre-existing framework domains.
Table 9.
Development of domain 1 –I am able to participate in my important activities and roles.
Table 10.
Development of domain 2 –I can participate in my important activities in the way I want to.
Table 11.
Development of domain 3 –My prosthesis works for me.
Table 12.
Development of domain 5—I am able to accept my new normal.
Fig 3.
Expanded conceptual model–the ECLIPSE model of meaningful outcome domains of lower limb prosthetic rehabilitation.