Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Overview of sample attrition for the current study.

Data set 1 (adolescents) and 2 (parents) were used separately for descriptive and psychometrical analyses. Dataset 3 consisted of matched adolescent-parent-dyads for the agreement analyses.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Translation and linguistic validation process.

N = absolute number of participants.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 1.

Injury and clinical related characteristics of adolescents.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Sociodemographic characteristics of the parents (N = 111).

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Comparison of relative frequencies of responses for the adolescents per subscale.

Due to rounding, not all percentages sum up to 100%. aSample size N = 117. b Values from the original English study [31] summed on the subscale level. Sample size N = 227.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Comparison of relative frequencies of responses for the parents per subscale.

a Sample size N = 111. b Values from the original English study [31] and summed on the subscale level. Sample size N = 521.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 3.

Descriptive statistics of the sub- and total scales for the PCSI and the RPQ.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Fit indices obtained from the CFA with Maximum-Likelihood estimation.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Reliability coefficients for the PCSI-SR13 and the PCSI-P.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Correlations between subscales for the PCSI-13 and the PCSI-P.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

Correlations between the PCSI and the RPQ, separated for self- and parent report.

More »

Table 7 Expand

Table 8.

Squared weighted Cohen’s k values for the agreement between adolescents and parents on item level.

More »

Table 8 Expand

Table 9.

Unadjusted intraclass-correlation for the agreement between adolescents and parents on subscale level and for the total scale.

More »

Table 9 Expand

Fig 5.

Comparison (in %) of absolute subscale and total scale values between self-report (PCSI-S13) and parent-report (PCSI-P).

Number of observations = 103. “Self-report > Parent-report” = proportion of higher scale scores for adolescents compared to parents, “Self-report = Parent-report” = proportion of equal scale scores between parents and adolescents, “Parent-report > Self-report” = proportion of higher scale scores for parents compared to adolescents. a Cognition subscale: Adolescents’ subscale score without item 18.

More »

Fig 5 Expand