Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Summary of ChatGPT’s performance on MedScape clinical case challenges.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Percentage of correct answers, most common answer and correct answer despite the majority incorrect by ChatGPT 3.5 with MedScape clinical case challenges.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Confusion matrix evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of ChatGPT 3.5, considering each answer within the 150 MedScape clinical case challenges.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Receiver Operator Curve (ROC) for the diagnostic accuracy of ChatGPT 3.5 answers within 150 MedScape clinical case challenges.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Cognitive load of ChatGPT 3.5 answers given in response to 150 MedScape clinical case challenges.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Quality of medical answers given by ChatGPT 3.5 response to 150 MedScape clinical case challenges.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Table 2.

Qualitative analysis of the strengths associated with ChatGPT’s answers in response to MedScape clinical case challenges.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Qualitative analysis and examples of the weaknesses associated with ChatGPT’s answers in response to MedScape clinical case challenges.

More »

Table 3 Expand