Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Schematic diagram of the research hypothesis.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Carbon emission factors for primary carbon sources.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Variables and descriptive statistics.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 2.

Trends in Dagum Gini coefficients for digital financial inclusion and agricultural carbon intensity.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Trends in inter-provincial agricultural carbon emission Dagum Gini coefficient rankings, 2010–2020.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 3.

Results of the baseline regression analysis.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Impact of the three-dimensional Indices of digital financial inclusion on the regional agricultural carbon emissions gap.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Unconditional quantile regression results.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Fig 4.

The plot of the quantile effect of China’s digital financial inclusion on the Dagum Gini coefficient of agricultural carbon intensity.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 6.

Distribution of digital financial inclusion impact on carbon intensity gap in agriculture by province.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

Results of the test for mediating effect (1).

More »

Table 7 Expand

Table 8.

Results of the test for mediating effect (2).

More »

Table 8 Expand

Table 9.

Regression results of the moderated effects model.

More »

Table 9 Expand

Table 10.

Endogeneity estimation results.

More »

Table 10 Expand

Table 11.

Robustness test results.

More »

Table 11 Expand

Table 12.

Spatial heterogeneity in the impact of digital financial inclusion on the carbon reduction gap in agricultural regions.

More »

Table 12 Expand

Table 13.

Re-weighted RIF-OB decomposition results.

More »

Table 13 Expand