Table 1.
Estimates of fixed effects in Experiment 1 with endorsers only.
Table 2.
Estimates of fixed effects in Experiment 2 with endorsers only.
Fig 1.
Estimated mean truth ratings across repetition (repeated, non-repeated) and claim type (science-aligning, skeptic-aligning) in Experiment 1.
Note. Error bars show 95% CI.
Fig 2.
Estimated mean truth ratings across repetition (repeated, non-repeated) and claim type (science-aligning, skeptic-aligning) in Experiment 2.
Note. Error bars show 95% CI.
Table 3.
Effect size calculations of the repetition effect across claim type in each Experiment.
Fig 3.
Raincloud plot of truth rating differences between repeated and non-repeated claims across claim types (all, scientist, skeptic, weather) in Experiment 1.
Shown is the difference between the truth ratings when claims were repeated vs. not repeated, computed as (mean of repeated claims minus mean of non-repeated claims), for each participant. Values above zero reflect a repetition-induced truth effect, where on average repeated claims are rated as more true than non-repeated claims.
Fig 4.
Raincloud plot of truth rating differences between repeated and non-repeated claims across claim types (all, scientist, skeptic, weather) in Experiment 2.
Shown is the difference between the truth ratings when claims were repeated vs. not repeated, computed as (mean of repeated claims minus mean of non-repeated claims), for each participant. Values above zero reflect a repetition-induced truth effect, where on average repeated claims are rated as more true than non-repeated claims.
Table 4.
Estimates of fixed effects using subjective claim type in Experiment 2 with endorsers only.
Fig 5.
Forest plot of effect sizes (dz) of repetition for skeptic aligning claims across climate change-endorsing SASSY groups (Alarmed, Concerned, Cautious).
Table 5.
Estimates of fixed effects in Experiment 2 for Alarmed group.