Fig 1.
Flow diagram of the progress through the phases (CONSORT diagram) as proposed by Moher et al. [42].
Table 1.
Sample characteristics by group.
Fig 2.
Testing procedures.
Fig 3.
A–Isometric pull-up, B–Bent arm hang, C–Finger strength measurement, D–Dead hang.
Table 2.
Scales used to assess exercise enjoyment, discomfort and pleasure.
Fig 4.
Ring training exercise with numbered tape on the floor to control the intensity.
Table 3.
Training levels on the fingerboard.
Table 4.
Bayesian output of the one-way ANOVAs regarding subject characteristics and pre-test measurements.
Fig 5.
Performance development over time and confidence intervals (CI95%) presented by group.
CG–control group, ST–off-the-wall training group, WT–on-the-wall training group.
Table 5.
Results from the Bayesian three-factor repeated measures MANCOVA (group, time, performance test)–showing best 5 out of 38 models.
Table 6.
Bayesian repeated measures MANCOVA of performance measurements post hoc comparisons–group.
Fig 6.
Strength development over time and confidence intervals (CI95%) presented by group.
CG–control group, ST–off-the-wall training group, WT–on-the-wall training group.
Table 7.
Results from the Bayesian three-factor repeated measures MANCOVA (group, time, strength test)–showing best 5 out of 38 models.
Fig 7.
Development of emotional measurements over time and confidence intervals (CI95%) presented by group.
RPE–Rate of perceived exertion, RPD–rate of perceived discomfort, PACES–physical activity enjoyment scale, EES–exercise enjoyment scale, FS–feeling scale, CG–control group, ST–off-the-wall training group, WT–on-the-wall training group, a/m/s/d–anecdotal/moderate/strong/decisive evidence regarding group and time differences in favour of RH4/RH5 or, in the case of a negative prefix, in opposition to RH4/RH5 (Regarding RPE and RPD, RH4 expects no group differences).
Table 8.
Results from the Bayesian repeated measures ANOVAs for RPE, RPD, ESS, FS, and PACES measurements.
Table 9.
Bayesian repeated measures ANOVA post hoc comparisons–time for RPE, RPD, EES, FS, and PACES.
Table 10.
Bayesian repeated measures ANOVA post hoc comparisons–group for RPE, RPD, EES, FS, and PACES.
Fig 8.
Four sub-scales of the intrinsic motivation inventory presented by group at post-test, including confidence intervals (CI95%).
ST–off-the-wall training group, WT–on-the-wall training group, m–moderate evidence in favour of RH5.
Table 11.
Results from the Bayesian Mann-Whitney U Test for IMI measurements.