Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Quantitative olfactory dysfunctions for COVID-19 positive (COVID+, N = 98) and COVID-19 naïve (COVID-, N = 41) groups.

(A) Mean TDI scores for COVID+ and COVID- groups with error bars denoting standard deviation (SD) as well as values for each participant indicated by circles. Dashed lines indicate cut-off scores for the clinical diagnoses Hyposmia (threshold score: 30.75) and Anosmia (threshold score: 16.25). Higher TDI scores (possible range 1–48) indicate better olfactory performance. TDI subscale scores for the COVID+ and COVID- groups are presented with error bars denoting standard deviation (SD) for (B) Threshold, (C) Discrimination, and (D) Identification scores separately.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Distribution of parosmia score.

A) Distribution of scores per patient group (N = 94), COVID-19 positive (COVID+) and COVID-19 naïve (COVID-, N = 38), on the Landis parosmia questionnaire. B) Percentage of individuals in each patient group, grouped by reported parosmia severity score. C) Proportion of COVID+ participants (N = 94) in each olfactory dysfunction classification group.

More »

Fig 2 Expand