Table 1.
Analyse of variance and significant tests for yield components and Striga parameters of 126 maize genotypes evaluated under Striga asiatica and S. hermonthica infestations.
Table 2.
Mean values for 14 traits of 126 maize genotypes evaluated under Striga asiatica infestation, showing the top 10 inbred lines, the top 4 hybrids, and 6 OPVs based on grain yield.
Table 3.
Mean responses for 14 traits of 126 maize genotypes evaluated under Striga hermonthica infestation, showing the top 10 inbred lines, the top 4 hybrids, and 6 OPVs.
Fig 1.
Dendrogram showing genetic relatedness among the 126 maize genotypes (G1 to G126) based on phenotypic traits under Striga asiatica-infested conditions.
See Supplemental Table 2 in S1 File for the code of genotypes.
Fig 2.
Dendrogram showing genetic relatedness among the 126 maize genotypes (G1 to G126) based on phenotypic traits under Striga hermonthica-infested conditions.
See Supplemental Table 3 in S1 File for the code of genotypes.
Table 4.
Genetic diversity parameters of 126 maize genotypes assessed based on 16000 SNP markers.
Fig 3.
Sub-population inference among the 126 maize genotypes based on 16000 SNPs: (A) likelihood and delta K values for different numbers of assumed clusters and (B) population structure among the 126 maize genotypes based on 16000 SNPs at K = 8.
Fig 4.
Principal coordinate analysis clustering of the test genotypes.
See Supplemental Table 3 in S1 File for the code of genotypes.
Table 5.
Genetic distance (upper diagonal), and pairwise inbreeding coefficients (lower diagonal), among eight populations resulting from 130 maize genotypes based on 16000 SNP profiling.
Table 6.
Analysis of molecular variance involving 130 maize accessions based on 16000 SNP markers.
Fig 5.
Hierarchical cluster dendrogram showing the genetic relationships among 126 maize accessions using 16000 SNP markers.
See Supplemental Table 3 in S1 File for the code of genotypes.
Fig 6.
Dendrogram showing relatedness among the 126 maize genotypes under Striga asiatica-infested conditions using genotypic and phenotypic data.
See Supplemental Table 4 in S1 File for the code of genotypes.
Fig 7.
Dendrogram showing relatedness among the 126 maize genotypes under Striga hermonthica conditions using genotypic and phenotypic data.
See Supplemental Table 4 in S1 File for the code of genotypes.
Fig 8.
Tanglegram comparing dendrograms based on evaluation of 126 maize genotypes evaluated using phenotypic (left) and genotypic data (right) under Striga asiatica conditions. See Supplemental Table 4 in S1 File for the code of genotypes.
Fig 9.
Tanglegram comparing dendrograms based on evaluation of 126 maize genotypes evaluated using phenotypic (left) and genotypic data (right) under Striga hermonthica conditions. See Supplemental Table 4 in S1 File for the code of genotypes.