Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

(A) The ERRAT quality factors of PDE4 structure. (B) Ramachandran plot. The yellow region shows the allowed region while the white region shows the disallowed regions.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

The developed pharmacophore models.

(A) The pharmacophoric features shown in the protein pocket. (B) The receptor cavity along with the pharmacophoric features.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 1.

The pharmacophore hypothesis features along with scores and coordinates in the receptor cavity.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

The hits generated during virtual screening, selected based on the phase screen scores.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 3.

The molecular structures of the compounds selected based on the binding affinities.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

The binding interactions of hits with protein.

The hydrogen bonds are shown by green spheres, hydrophobic interactions are shown by magenta color, the purple lines show pi-sigma, while orange lines show the pi-sulfur interactions.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

The plausible binding modes of the selected compounds are represented with the sticks in the binding pocket of protein.

The orientation of the hits is also shown in the pocket separately. (A) D356-2630 (B) D356-2542 (C) 8525–0383 (D) C700-2058 (E) D359-0432 (F) G842-0420 (G) G289-0060 (H) 8525–0381 (I) 7752–0515 (J) F403-0203.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Table 3.

The docking scores, interacting residues and the hydrogen bond distances of the selected compounds with protein.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

The predicted bioactivity scores of the selected compounds against different human receptors.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

The ADMET and toxicity risks analysis of the selected hits.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

The toxicity profiles of the selected hits.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Fig 6.

The RMSD protein along with selected hits calculated during simulation.

(A) D356-2630 (B) C700-2058 (C) G842-0420 (D) F403-0203.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

The residual flexibility of the complexes during simulation along with the loop regions with higher fluctuations.

(A) D356-2630 (B) C700-2058 (C) G842-0420 (D) F403-0203.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

The Protein-Ligand contacts generated during the 100 ns simulation.

(A) D356-2630 complex. B) C700-2058 complex. (C) G842-0420 complex. (D) F403-0203 complex. Green shows hydrogen bonding, purple shows hydrophobic interactions, and blue shows the water bridges.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Principal component analysis of the selected complexes.

(A) D356-2630 B) C700-2058 (C) G842-0420 (D) F403-0203.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

PCA based free energy surface of the complex calculated during simulation.

(A) D356-2630 B) C700-2058 (C) G842-0420 (D) F403-0203.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Fig 11.

The comparison of binding free energy components in selected complexes.

More »

Fig 11 Expand